Sony Paint Ad: First HD Advert In UK

Sony Paint Ad: First HD Advert In UKSony and Sky are tying up to show the UK’s first HD advert tonight.

You may well have seen a lot of the build-up for Sony’s latest advert – the one with the paint. It’s the follow-up to their coloured balls advert shot in San Francisco.

Appropriately the advert is for Sony’s Bravia range of HD TVs. Shot in the somewhat less-glamorous location of a disused tower block in Glasgow, Scotland, it shows 70, 000 litres of coloured paint exploding up the side of the block of flats.

Sony Paint Ad: First HD Advert In UKShot over 10 days and with a crew of 250 people, the paint was mixed on site by 20 people. The clear up took 5 days and 60 people.

Behind the scenes footage of the shoot has been circulating on the online video services for about two months now. The wobbly camcorder shot material lends itself to looking like it’s been shot by your ‘man in the street,’ but given the size of the campaign, it’s more likely to be seeded by Sony or their advertising agency, to try and create a build up of interest.

Here’s the finished results.

It makes total sense for Sony to shoot this ad in HD given they’ve been pushing HD for nearly 3 years in Europe – initially through their professional arm that sells the cameras. Given their zeal in this area it makes you wonder why it took so long for an HD advert to come out from them.

Sony Paint Ad: First HD Advert In UKThe launch of this first HD ad follows a major marketing agreement between Sky and Sony to promote HD.

The HD advert will shown on Sky Sports HD 2 tonight during the Chelsea vs Barcelona football coverage.

US Web Half-Yearly Advertising Revenue Hits $8bn

US Web Half-Yearly Advertising Revenue Hits $8bnU.S. Internet advertising revenue has hit a new record high of nearly $8 billion for first six months of the year, increasing by a money-spinning 37 per cent, according to a new study.

The figures from a report by the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) and PricewaterhouseCoopers, suggest Internet advertising revenue has continued to surge, despite a recent warning by Yahoo that new media ad spending could be slowing.

Yahoo pointed to weaknesses in two key sectors in marketing – automobile and financial firms – although some analysts think that the claimed slowdown is more about Yahoo’s own business declining and is not symptomatic of an industry-wide trend.

“The latest results reaffirm the Internet’s growing importance for marketers to integrate online advertising into their overall media plans,” commented David Silverman, Partner, Entertainment & Media Practice, PricewaterhouseCoopers.

“While search advertising remains the largest format in terms of revenues, we expect to see new formats like video ads to continue to emerge as advertisers seek to leverage the branding opportunities afforded by the growing installed base of broadband users,” headded.

US Web Half-Yearly Advertising Revenue Hits $8bnThe IAB/ PricewaterhouseCoopers figures show that Internet advertising revenue totalled nearly $4.1 billion in the last quarter, representing a thumping a 36 percent increase over the same period last year, and up a healthy 5.5 percent over the first quarter of 2006.

The study also reports that search-related advertising rose 40 percent in the first half of 2006, with classified advertising rising 20 percent.

“With the seventh consecutive quarter of growth behind us we are confident that the Internet will continue to reconcile the imbalances between its share of media consumption versus its relative share of total advertising spend,” enthused Pete Petrusky, director, Entertainment & Media Practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Elsewhere, the Online Publishers Association (which includes CNET, iVillage and Reuters), forecasted a rosy future for its members, saying that it expected online advertising grow about 28 percent for the third quarter, with most of its members “seeing strength in all advertising categories with no areas appearing to slow down.”

[Via Reuters]

Fox Plays With “Blinks”: Super-Short Advertising

Clear Channel, Fox Deliver Super-Short Advertising BlinksWe’ve all known for years that PVR’s have been eating TV advertising. Murdoch has been on top of this for ages too, which makes it all the more interesting to hear that his Fox network is using 2-second Blinks, adverts. Digital Music News covers what is happening.

Clear Channel Radio realigned its advertising strategy last year by structuring shorter spots, a move designed to spark greater listener stickiness. The strategy, dubbed “Less Is More,” has now gone into overdrive with the “blink,” an incredibly short spot that runs about two seconds.

The ultra-fast slot is now being used by Fox to promote several shows, including “Prison Break,” “House,” and “The Simpsons.” The quick punch is designed to create an instant connection, and drive subsequent viewers. “Like our breakthrough programming, these spots are one-of-a-kind, and through the power of radio, they will be heard across the country,” said Kaye Bentley, senior vice president at the Fox Broadcasting Company.

Clear Channel, Fox Deliver Super-Short Advertising BlinksOverall, Clear Channel Radio has experienced mixed results following Less Is More, though recent quarters have shown positive revenue increases. Clear Channel executives have credited those jumps to the shortened advertising slots, which address a major source of radio listener irritation.

From a broader perspective, the concept is also designed to discourage listener migration towards competing formats like satellite radio subscriptions and even iPod collections. Blinks have already run for “Prison Break,” and get started for “House” and “The Simpsons” early next month.

Viacom’s Big Shift to Digital: Summarised

Viacom's Big Shift to Digital: SummarisedViacom have been making further moves to secure their future in digital media. Given all of the moves they’ve made this week, we thought it was worth summarising it.

The first recent deal was the one with Viacom doing a multi-part deal with Google. Viacom will provide Google with video clips and commercials for syndication through Google’s AdSense network, with income being split three ways, Viacom; Google; and the Web site owner. Videos from the Viacom group of companies will also sell their videos on Google Video for $1.99.

The day after this Viacom announced that they were going to buy Atom Entertainment (AtomShockwave as was, made up of Shockwave.com, AddictingGames.com, AtomFilms.com and AddictingClips.com). Viacom put $200m on the table for this one.

They’re be adding this to their other recent purchases, XFIRE, Y2M, GameTrailers.com, IFILM and Neopets, placing them all under MTV Networks.

Viacom's Big Shift to Digital: SummarisedViacom are experts at delivering messages (TV, films and adverts to you and me) on television and films, and as we can see from the above deals, they’ve caught on that they really ought to be able to do this online too. To try and simplify this, they were looking for a way to smooth the transition of their content to the digital realm.

This brings us to the latest deal, between Viacom and Adobe, where Adobe’s Engagement Platform will be the preferred tool to digitise the content. The two will also ‘work together in developing new media applications,’ which sounds like an interesting idea, sadly no further detail was available.

The upshot of this is pretty bad news for Microsoft and Real as Viacom will be serving all of the online video adverts using Flash Video. Another nail in the coffin for a use of Microsoft’s Windows Media.

Viacom
Google
Atom Entertainment
Adobe

Google Video: Advertising Sponsorship

Google Video: Advertising SponsorshipGoogle Video has been serving videos to the Internet population for over a year and a half now, both paid download via their Video Store.

Today, when researching a story, we noticed that they’ve also brought in a third model – sponsored playback, a new one to us. Never let it be said that given an opportunity to raise advertising dollars, Google aren’t at the forefront.

Above the video being played back is a banner containing the logo of the advertiser (in this case HP), a couple of lines of advertising copy and a couple of links.

How the financial on this works isn’t clear, but we’d assume that the owner of the contact will receive some payment from the sponsor, via gogole, for each video that is watched, in a similar way that the record companies get paid a small number of pennies when a people play their artists music on a monthly music subscription service.

One interesting feature is that the video is still available for purchase, as the version that is shown is at a lower quality than the for-sale version. Google call the for-free version Preview, although for our purposes, retrieving information from the programme, this is all that we’d need. You could see that other types of programs would benefit from higher resolution.

Google Video: Advertising SponsorshipClicking on Watch their Ad link opens a new browser session and plays the video advert from … Google Video. All very neat.

It is interesting to note that the cost from Google, in this case 99c, is significantly less than the price when purchased from Charlie Rose’s own site, which is available on DVD or VHS at at least $30.

What is powerful about this rendition of advertising with video content is that the brand is associated with the content, in our case a well known and respected US journalist, and the viewer is given the opportunity of watching the content. They aren’t forced to watch it, as we commented about at the end of the recent review of GoTuit, and are they given the opportunity to stop watching it whenever they feel like it.

Example of Google Video being sponsored by an advertiser.

PayPal Exclusive Wallet On Yahoo: Wide-ranging Deal

PayPal Exclusive Wallet On Yahoo: Wide-ranging Deal PayPal is to be the exclusive online wallet across Yahoo’s product and services. In a wide-ranging, four component, business arrangement announced today, eBay and Yahoo will be stroking each other commercial departments.

In their words, PayPal will be “deeply integrated on the Yahoo! site and will receive prominent positioning when users purchase Yahoo! services.” Beyond this PayPal will also be offered to Yahoo’s merchants and publishers, including the Yahoo Publisher Network, Yahoo Search Marketing, Yahoo Merchant Solutions and other small business services.

Yahoo exclusive graphics ad provider to eBay
Additional details of the “you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours” big dollar deal include Yahoo being the exclusive provider of graphical advertising on eBay.

PayPal Exclusive Wallet On Yahoo: Wide-ranging Deal Interestingly Yahoo will also be offering sponsored search for complementary products on some eBay.com search results pages in the U.S.

Click-to-Call Advertising “being explored”
As we’re sure you know, Click-to-Call will let the user click on an icon on an advert and speak directly to the advertiser, without touching the phone.

PayPal Exclusive Wallet On Yahoo: Wide-ranging DealFor us, this part of the announcement is a bit of a strange one. Yahoo has Yahoo Messenger with Voice and eBay has Skype, so who would provide the voice services in which circumstances is pretty unclear, and we would have though, an area for friction.

What they’re saying about it is, “Yahoo and eBay do not expect this relationship to have a material impact on their financial results in 2006. Both companies will incorporate any financial impact for 2007 and beyond when they deliver their business outlook for those periods.” Make of that what you will.

Telewest Get ASA Dodgy Advert Slapdown

Telewest Get ASA Dodgy Advert SlapdownBroadband giants Telewest have had to bend over and feel the sharp swish of the Advertising Standards Agency’s corrective ruler on their ample rumps after their broadband radio advert was deemed ‘misleading.’

The advert seemed straightforward enough:

“… getting broadband couldn’t be easier. Telewest even install it for you. Get unlimited broadband and you can also have digital TV and a phone line, all three for £30 a month. If you live in a Telewest area and you want all three for £30 a month for a year call xxxx or go to Telewest.co.uk. Available to customers taking new services. Minimum term contract and conditions apply.”

Telewest Get ASA Dodgy Advert SlapdownA Telewest customer – clearly already living in a Telewest area – liked the sound of the deal so much they rang up to sign on, only to find that they were clearly in the wrong sort of ‘Telewest area.’

When the customer was told that the full range of Telewest products was not in fact available, a stroppy mail was despatched to ASA who made short thrift of Telewest’s insistence that their “Conditions apply” caveat covered their ass.

With Telewest admitting that they were unable to offer digital services to 100% of their customers as 3.7% were situated in non-digital areas, the bendy ruler of the ASA was administered with relish as the complaint was upheld.

Telewest Get ASA Dodgy Advert SlapdownThe ASA concluded, “We considered this important restriction should have been explained in the ad and that “Conditions apply” had not been adequate to cover such a significant condition to the offer. The ad breached CAP (Broadcast) Radio Advertising Standards Code section 2, rule 3.”

ASA

When Corporate Mashups Go Wrong: Chevy Tahoe

When Corporate Mashups Go Wrong: Chevy TahoeCompanies are now starting to dip their toe into the world of Mashups/user-generated content – but when the user is generating it, the results might not always be what they expect or desire. We’ve seen a few examples of this today.

Uber-car maker Chevrolet – or their agencies – came up with a great wheeze. They’ve put tools on the Web to allow the worlds users remix and mash-up their latest Chevy Tahoe adverts.

It’s not hard to imagine the scene. The agency person, having hear from his ‘Geek’ source that mashups were ‘The Latest Thing’, over-enthusiasticly pitching it to Chevy

When Corporate Mashups Go Wrong: Chevy TahoeAmazingly the thing that they don’t appear to have noticed is that many people see Chevy as Uber in a couple of sense – the sheer size of their company and, importantly for this piece, in the sheer size of the cars on the road and fuel-guzzling nature.

Some witty wags have used the Chevy tools to create adverts mocking the over-sized cars, the nature of their advertising and the company generally.

Selection of spoof ads
Roll-up, roll-up get them while they’re fresh (and before they get taken down by those that be).

Where’s My Helicopter? – This mocks the unreachable locations that car companies put their cars in for adverts, then proceeds to question if a 4×4 car of this size is really needed when they are, on the whole, only used to drive to the shopping mall.

Global Warming – The sights of this spoof are a little more ambitious – asking why the USA reaction to the threat of Global Warming is to make and sell cars like the Chevy Tahoe.

Flowers – This one addresses the over-sized, aggressive nature of the car. Summary – Where have all of the flower gone? Who cares? My truck’s bigger than yours and I’ll crush you.

When Corporate Mashups Go Wrong: Chevy TahoeWe love the idea of corporate tools being used against those who are paying for they development, hosting and bandwidth, but suspect that corporate number two who approaches this may take a different approach. This won’t of course stop those who are angered by this type of thing using their own footage to the same affect.

Expect people in the marketing department to get fired over this one. People who run companies like Chevrolet don’t like to be made to looks foolish. Perhaps if they moved to destroy the planet a little less they’d get a better reception from the world.

Thanks to Holy-Moly! for the pointer to the videos on this one.

Google – Read, Right? Edit

Suppose you ran a Web site, and got a little money in advertising. And then suppose someone came along, and said: “I can give you more readers, and extra advertising!” – would you be grateful? Especially if this was genuine, and tested out? Well, Russell Buckley isn’t grateful.

His moan sounds silly, but effectively, his gripe is that when Google Mobile take pages for his site and configure them for mobile phone surfers, they take out the adverts, and put their own adverts on. And he’s complained to Google about this, and blogged it, and still, they don’t respond.

He has, nonetheless, a point. His actual argument, when you strip away the egotism of comparing his complaint about Google with the collapse of Kryptonite business, is that Google is actually editing his page, not just formatting it.

The Kryptonite comparison, summary: inhabitants of the InterWeb Blogland discovered you could steal a bike locked with Kryptonite even if all you had was a ball point pen, and Kryptonite dismissed those quaint Bloglanders as irrelevant. Well, yes; if you sell a product which is shown to be non-functional, you need to deal with the bad press.

But the comparison viewed in one way is empty. Google is doing nothing of the sort – its product works, and works as described. It adds extra revenue to the Web site owner’s income stream, and it does it by making a sensible call on how to format pages.

Viewed from another position, you might think that Google should start of listen to the buzz on the blogs (it’s not like they don’t have the tool to find out is it!), in the way that Kryptonite _didn’t_.

That said, Google is arrogating to itself a decision which you’d normally expect the Web site manager to make: what appears on the Web page. And it really ought to have the consent of the site manager to do that. And if it hasn’t, then it should talk.

Now, I can see Google’s point. “What is this guy’s problem?” you might say. After all, most adverts on Web pages are there without the explicit consent of the site manager. One-click and other advert providers post adverts “on the fly” and track the individual user. Click on one advert for fast cars, and they’ll probably show you more next time you visit; and they don’t ring up the Web site manager and ask specific permission. They just download the advert. (Eventually. When you’re almost out of patience, and thinking of switching to Firefox and running Adblock. Another story…)

What Google is doing is even more sensible. They are saying: “This advert is simply too big to run on a mobile phone. It will cost the phone owner real dosh to download, it won’t render properly, the advertiser will be horrified to see how it looks, and it will hide the actual page content which the subscriber wants to see. We’ll hide it, and show a Google Adsense advert instead.”

And frankly, most of us would say: “Exactly what we want you to do!” – and at the end of the day, the site owner gets a share of the Adsense revenue, from readers who wouldn’t have seen the page otherwise.

But if Russell told Google he didn’t want them to do that. He’s entitled to do so. And he blogged it when they ignored him. And yes, his blog got some traction – in that other bloggers linked to it – and Google still ignored him.

I get the impression his bona fides are not altogether clear, here, because someone who ought to know, has said that Russell has (or has had) an association with a rival outfit – Yahoo. It would be good to hear his response to that – but if true, it’s definitely something he should have disclosed. We’re pleased to say that Russell did get in touch, and we thank him for that. He assures us that he has no connections with Yahoo, and therefore has no axe to grind on this one.

At the end of the day, whatever the rights and wrongs of his approach, and whether he’s exaggerating the influence of his blog and the blogworld, or not, he has a point: Google is being arrogant. It is making decisions which its mobile clients have not asked for, and even, have specifically asked them not to do – and when they complain, it isn’t responding.

It may be small beer to Google, but it’s exactly this “faceless bureaucracy” which is its Achilles heel. Anybody who deals with the company will tell you that getting a real person to respond, is harder than getting a refund out of City Hall; and that the “don’t be evil” motto appears to be one which Google parses according to its own standards, not necessarily those of the rest of us.

The Blog System That’s Eating Blogs

The Blog System That's Eating BlogsMaking blogging too easy seems to be making it hard. It may be coincidence, but one example of “too easy” blogging is the spam blog, or splog – and suddenly, there’s a rash of upset bloggers who have had their blogs blacked.

The latest example, listed on “the other Inquirer” tells the sad tale of a long-term addict to public navel-gazing: “I have been blogging since April 16, 2004, a day after my youngest daughter was born. On March 8, 2006, I was surprised to find my blog locked,” he writes.

The villain – as listed – is Blogger. Blogger has several tools designed to stop your public diary from being filled up with spam. And understandably! – there’s really nothing more frustrating than posting a deeply-held opinion, and coming back a day later to find it full of dozens, even hundreds, of comments that actually aren’t comments at all. They’re simply spam: “Great blog! You might like to read about my organ enhancement products on *www.biggusdickus.blogspot.com” and all pointing to the same crooked site.

The Blog System That's Eating BlogsAnd a spam blog is something that doesn’t actually have any real content. It’s just links to trackback pointers for everybody else. The trouble is, all the signs of a spam blog are caused by the ease with which they are built. You just have to create the blog (two clicks) and then set up a robot that scours the web for new posts, and links to the trackbacks.

So, the coincidence: just before he got black-listed, our navel gazer switched to a blog automator. The product is one of so many I can’t make myself go there. It’s called Qumana, and what it does (amongst other things) is allow you to create your blog quickly and easily, including advertising, even if you’re offline. You’ll get an idea of the scale of the problem if you look at Technorati’s tag for Qumana.

Yes, in a fit of egotism, idiocy, the authors decided to write software that creates a tag for qumana for every blog page that is created on qumana. It doesn’t matter whether the subject is carrots, cameras or carcases; the tag for Qumana will also be created. As a result, you’ll have real trouble finding what the current discussion about Qumana is about; it’s lost in the backgroud noise.

The Blog System That's Eating BlogsI’m not saying that Qumana is what caused the blog to be blacked. I am saying that if it produces a series of random, unrelated tags to a single site, it’s going to fulfil one of the prime indicators of a splog. And when random, unrelated blog entries all get tagged “Qumana” whatever their subject, you have something so similar, it’s going to be quite hard to see what a blog provider can do to filter it.

So our injured blogger has moved from Blogger to WordPress – which is something that could be said about better publications than his – and Blogger has instituted a standard “are you human?” check. But the real problem is that if you make blogging so easy that anybody can do it, anybody (or are splog creators things) will do it. And quality and quantity are not always good bedfellows.

*( for Monty Python fans, that is not a real URL! – yet)