What Are The Conservatives TMT Sector Policies?

What Are The Tories UK TMT Sector Policies?If you were to consider UK telecoms, media, and technology (TMT) policy since Parliament passed the Communications Act 2003 and brought about the formation of Ofcom much has happened. The regulatory machinery of the state has swung into action with relative efficiency, taking on such issues as BT’s marketplace position, digital switchover, and public subsidy and control of broadcasting and new media. And we are starting – just starting – to see the results of some those efforts.

But up until now, it is fair to say that the Conservative Party have basically ceded influence over the TMT policy arena to New Labour – not least because Labour has been the party of power during what has been a period of radical technological change. The Conservatives, for a number of reasons, have been somewhat ineffectual at making their voices heard in this space … leaving observers such as ourselves largely unsure of where the party stands on most issues impacting the TMT sector.

What Are The Tories UK TMT Sector Policies?This is not a good thing. These industries are massively influential from a social and economic perspective. According to Ofcom, for example, the U.K. communications marketplace has an annual turnover of £55.9 billion. That’s tens of thousands of jobs and billions of pounds at stake. Policies applicable to the TMT sector also affect how the U.K.

  • (i) sees itself,
  • (ii) communicates,
  • (iii) drives its economy,
  • (iv) learns,
  • (v) projects global influence, etc.

What can we say? The TMT sector is already staggeringly important and will become more so as economies across the globe become increasingly interlinked through electronic communications technologies. So it is common sense that there be senior level engagement with technology issues across all political parties.

This holds particularly true for the Conservative Party.

  • Firstly, they are the UK’s main opposition party.
  • Secondly they are currently engaged in a process of revamping their image and re-orientating their policy offering in order to be relevant.
  • Thirdly, technology – and the policy and regulation associated with it – is always relevant.

However, any proposed policy and regulation must be backed by new thinking. So, although we have been told what sort of music David Cameron has put onto his new iPod, we don’t yet know how he thinks this technology might be used to deliver public service broadcasting or for that matter public services, or what the rights issues might be, and how all of this might impact the commercial market.

Of course there won’t be any answers overnight – and we don’t expect the Conservatives to suddenly unveil a raft of policy positions in what is a highly complex and constantly evolving area. But without doubt there’s a genuine and important opportunity here for the party. Developing a keen and critical understanding of TMT and proposing broad policies likely to harness the benefits that stem from new technologies would provide a platform that would assist the party in being seen as critical to delivering a modern Britain.

What Are The Tories UK TMT Sector Policies?Certainly the party is already developing new ideas (or in some cases adopting the opposition’s cast-offs) in other policy areas. And by all accounts, David Cameron is doing an effective job of moving the Tories back toward the centre of British politics. The new leader appears flexible and open to new policy approaches. But nothing definite is happening in the TMT space. We think it should.

So with this in mind, we have decided that 2006 would be a good time to try and stimulate the political debate in regard to issues impacting the TMT industries by occasionally placing a specific focus on what the Conservatives might look to do for the sector. In doing this we hope to assess, encourage and develop thinking as to what the Conservatives have to offer if (and when) they return to power.

We will not be attempting to write the Conservative Party’s policies in regard to the TMT sector. Far from it – as always, we hope to provide a dialogue – a small impetus that might get a much bigger ball rolling. And any debate on would possibly include the views of those who may not be supporters of the Conservative Party – new or old. We remains open to all.

Tomorrow, in the second installment, we’ll get in to the details of what could get the ball rolling.

Luke Gibbs and Russ Taylor are founders of OfcomWatch

Oxford Media Convention 2006

19.Jan.06 The 2006 Oxford Media Convention organised by ippr in association with MediaGuardian and PCMLP, Oxford University will focus on the role of public service broadcasting and media regulation in a digital age. Convergence, which has been talked about for so long, is finally upon us, as the internet and mobile phones are gradually becoming viable platforms for consuming and sharing all forms of content. The public contract between media companies and citizens is being rewritten, with fundamental reviews of the BBC and other broadcasters, to bring them in line with the new giants of audiovisual. Saïd Business School, Oxford University, UKhttp://media.guardian.co.uk/oxfordmediaconvention

Channel 4 First Podcast Fronted By Jon Snow

Jon Snow Fronts Channel 4 1st PodcastUK TV broadcaster Channel 4 is joining the podcast steam train by launching their first podcast presented by the very excellent, Jon Snow, the front-man for the highly-regarded Channel 4 News.

The strangely named “From Mellow to Mental” is aimed at the yout(h) market, as will be “looking at issues affecting young people today.”

The first half-hour report will explore the current controversy surrounding the link between cannabis and mental health problems. Just what the kids of the new generation want to hear.

Channel 4 are cleverly using this podcast give-away to highlight their DAB radio ambitions, as the show will also be broadcast on their 51%-owned DAB station, OneWorld, on Friday 20th January at 8am and 4pm.

Jon Snow Fronts Channel 4 1st PodcastBig Chief, Channel 4’s Chief Executive, Andy Duncan, speaking at the Oxford Media Convention today (19th January), said: “We’re delighted Jon has agreed to present Channel 4’s first podcast. It’s great to be creating a genuine public service offering for new users on different platforms. And, as part of a possible bid for the new DAB national multiplex, it’s important that we start to explore the considerable potential to create cross-over content from the best of Channel 4’s output.”

So there’s not too many lines to read between there. Channel 4 has big DAB ambitions, and Andy D has got a strong digital background, coming from his previous position as marketing Freeview to the British public for the BBC. Something he was clearly pretty good at, given the considerable take up figures, which started at zero.

Channel 4 podcast

UK Still Slow To Use WiFi: Survey

UK Public Yet To Embrace Wi-FiWi-Fi usage has still a long way to go before it really catches on in the UK according to a new survey carried out by Toshiba.

Toshiba quizzed around 3,300 of its UK consumers about various issues relating to notebooks and found that many users were still wary of flicking the WiFi switches on their laptops.

Despite the UK virtually buzzing with wireless hotspots (it’s estimated that there’s currently over 10,000 Wi-Fi locations scattered around the UK), take-up remains low.

According to Toshiba’s figures, only 11% of consumers make use of Wi-Fi when in hotels, just 7% log on when on trains and a paltry 3% get surfing in the spiritual home of Web connectivity, the coffee shop.

UK Public Yet To Embrace Wi-FiThese figures seem in stark contrast to our recent trip to New York where Web cafes were positively packed with Wi-Fi surfing customers.

So why aren’t people connecting?

Toshiba’s study claims that 23% of users with suitably equipped notebooks stated they didn’t use wirelessly technology because they didn’t fancy shelling out for access time, 19% cited security concerns for avoiding Wi-Fi while a further 19% had a more pragmatic answer: they simply didn’t know how to use the wireless functions of their notebook.

It seems that lack of adequate cover also played a part, with 15% of respondees saying that there weren’t enough wireless locations for them to truly capitalise on wireless technology.

UK Public Yet To Embrace Wi-FiNot surprisingly, a fear of someone swiping their laptop played a big part in people’s reluctance to whip out the Wi-Fi (25%) as did privacy fears (27%).

Elsewhere in the study, Toshiba found that 90% of those questioned believed that owning a laptop meant they ended up working longer hours, with a fifth of laptop owners claiming they now work more than 10 hours a day.

It seems people undervalue the contents of their machines too, with 65% reckoning that the content of their laptop was worth less than £1,000, even though many were using them to store expensive music collections, irreplaceable personal photos and important work documentation.

Toshiba UK
(Via Pocket Lint, despite the hickup!)

Digg this!

Lumix LX1 By Panasonic Review – A Flawed Gem (86%)

Panasonic Lumix LX1 Review: A Flawed GemWith a high-end feature set offering auto, scene, aperture and shutter priority modes plus full manual exposure controls, Panasonic’s beautifully sculpted 8 megapixel LX1 is clearly aimed at the discerning photographer who knows their ISO from their f-stop.

The camera – available in silver or black – is the world’s first compact camera to offer a panoramic 16:9 ratio CCD sensor -perfect for displaying on widescreen TVs – as well as 4:3 and 3:2 shooting ratios.

Despite its traditional appearance, the LX1 provides a class-leading level of control for digital photographers who like to wear the trousers when it comes to exposure (if you, err, get what we mean).

Panasonic Lumix LX1 Review: A Flawed GemOn most compact digcams, exposure adjustments are invariably achieved by fiddly excursions through endless sub-menus, but the LX1’s design affords fast, direct access to a host of vital functions like ISO rating, shutter speed, aperture and file size/quality – essential for those looking to capture the ‘decisive moment’.

Aspect ratios

Most digicams use sensors with a 4:3 aspect ratio (similar to a standard TV), but the LX1 lets you choose between three different picture shapes; 16:9, 3:2 (print size) and 4:3.

Panasonic Lumix LX1 Review: A Flawed GemAlthough some cameras mimic a 16:9 shooting ratio by cropping off the top and bottom of the picture, the LX1 has a true 16:9 sensor, with users able to switch formats via a handy switch on the lens barrel (no sub-menu burrowing needed).

We grew to love the vast, cinema-like sweep of pictures recorded in 16:9 – so much so that photos taken on other digicams looked positively cramped in comparison.

Images came out pin-sharp courtesy of the Leica branded 28-112mm (equiv.), offering a bright F2.8 at the wideangle setting, dropping down to a less impressive F4.9 at the telephoto end.

It’s worth noting that you lose the extreme wideangle when you switch to the more conventional 4:3 or 3:2 modes, which offer a 34-136mm zoom range.

At the back of the camera, there’s a large, bright 207,000 pixel, 2.5-inch LCD screen with a near lag-free refresh rate. We had no problems seeing what was going on in all but the brightest of sunlight, but an optical viewfinder would have been a handy addition.

Panasonic Lumix LX1 Review: A Flawed GemCamera controls

The main controls to the right of the LCD were simple and easy to use, and we had no problems navigating the menus using the four-way controller.

A smaller multi-directional ‘joystick’ lets you adjust aperture and shutter speeds in the relevant modes, as well as set manual focus.

Pressing the joystick brings up a convenient ‘quick menu’ for changing common shooting options like ISO, white balance etc – a great example of the photographer-led usability that sets this camera apart from the pack.

Panasonic did blot their copybook slightly however, with a few poor translations in their sub-menus – not what you expect from a top of the range camera.

Panasonic Lumix LX1 Review: A Flawed GemPhotographic modes

Along with the enthusiast-pleasing manual, aperture and shutter priority exposure modes, there’s a host of auto scene modes covering just about every photographic eventuality we can think of. These include portrait, sports, food, scenery, night scenery, self-portrait, night portrait and a rather curious ‘baby’ option.

In use, we found the LX1 to be very responsive, with impressively fast focusing, shutter lag and shot-to-shot times.

Exposure was spot on more or less every time, with the camera delivering stunning resolution, razor-sharp images stuffed full of detail.

The control layout proved intuitive and a pleasure to use, and we’d go as far as to say that this is the best handling compact digital camera we’ve ever come across – not only does the LX1 look great, it feels great to use too!

In fact, we found ourselves taking more pictures with the LX1 than any other camera on the desk, with its extensive range of features encouraging creativity and experimentation.

Flawed gem

The Lumix was on track to being our perfect camera, until we found a veritable swarm of bluebottles appearing in the ointment when the sun went down.

We’re talking high ISO image noise. Tons of it.

Even at 80 and 100 ISO there’s more noise than many of its rivals, and as the ISO ratings rose, the heartache increased.

At 200 ISO, you’ll be reaching for noise reduction software like Noise Ninja and Neat Image. At 400 ISO you’ll be wondering what possessed you to spend so much on the camera.

Panasonic Lumix LX1 Review: A Flawed GemOf course, the capable image stabilisation goes some way to compensate for these serious shortcomings, allowing handheld longer exposures at low ISO ratings, but that’s going to be a dead loss if you’re trying to freeze action in low light.

It’s a real shame that Panasonic has kitted this marvellous camera out with such a noisy sensor, although it needn’t be a deal breaker.

If you’re only looking to knock out small prints, then the high ISO noise won’t be so much of an issue, and if you’re prepared to put the work into processing RAW files, things improve radically.

Obviously, if your interest lies in landscapes, cityscapes, studio shots and other scenarios where low ISO ratings and tripods are de facto, image noise becomes a non issue.

Panasonic Lumix LX1 Review: A Flawed GemConclusion

The Lumix LX1 is in many ways the perfect digital compact, offering a feast of features for demanding prosumers with enough automated modes to please the point’n’shoot brigade.

Offering unparalleled handling, lovely Leica-like looks (try saying that after a few beers), superb optics, fast handling and RAW capability, the camera is capable of producing astonishingly good results.

The only thing stopping us awarding the LX1 a frothing-at-the-mouth ten out of ten rating is its poor high ISO handling – but if you’re prepared to work within the camera’s limitations, you can expect to be rewarded with a camera capable of the very, very highest results.

RATING: 86%
Pros: Beautiful finish, fantastic handling, manual controls, pin-sharp lens, image stabilisation.
Cons: Unacceptable noise over 100ISO, clip on lens cover, average battery life.

Lumic LX1
Street price: UK: £350 (~$616 ~e509)

SPECS:
Sensor: 1/1.65″ CCD, 8.61 megapixels (16:9 aspect ratio)
Image Quality: RAW/TIFF/Fine/Standard
Movie clips: Quicktime (.mov) M-JPEG with audio – 640 x 480 (10/30 fps, 320 x 240 (10/30 fps), 848 x 480 (10/30 fps) (16:9)
Lens: Leica DC Vario-Elmarit, 28 – 112 mm equiv. (4x zoom), F2.8 – F4.9
MEGA OIS: (Mode 1 / Mode 2)
Shooting modes: Auto, Program Mode (with Program Shift), Aperture Priority Mode, Shutter Priority Mode, Manual Mode, Portrait, Sports, Food, Scenery, Night Scenery, Self-portrait, Night Portrait, Fireworks, Party, Snow, Baby, Soft Skin, Starry Sky, Candle, Moving Image
Shutter Speeds: 1/4 – 1/2000 sec.: Auto, 60 – 1/2000 sec. Manual
Sensitivity: Auto, ISO 80,100,200,400
Metering: Intelligent Multiple, Center-weighted, Spot
Continuous: 3 fps high speed, 2 fps low speed, 9 frames (standard), 5 frames (fine)
Flash: Auto, on/off, red-eye reduction: on/off, slow sync with red eye reduction
Range (ISO auto): W 0.6m – 4.1m, T: 0.3m – 2.3m
Storage: SD/MMC
Weight (inc batt) 220 g (7.8 oz)
Dimensions 106 x 56 x 26 mm (4.2 x 2.2 x 1.0 in)

Firefox Grabs 20% Of Europe. Sometimes.

Firefox Grabs 20% European Market Share. Well, SometimesAccording to figures released by French Web metrics firm XiTi, the open source Mozilla Firefox browser has now grabbed a massive 20% average market share in Europe, creating a growing challenge to the current leader, Microsoft Internet Explorer.

Basing its figures on a Europe-wide sample of 32.5 million Web sites visited on the 8 January, 2006, XiTi declared Finland to be the Firefox hot spot of Europe, with 38% of surfers using the free software.

In second and third place were Slovenia and Germany with 36 and 30% of users, respectively.

Firefox Grabs 20% European Market Share. Well, SometimesOver here in Blighty, it seems that the Brits are yet to be wooed by the might of Mozilla, with the country recording one of the lowest proportions of Firefox users in Europe – just 11%.

Although the continuing onslaught of Firefox looks disastrous for Microsoft, the figures come with a Godzilla-sized caveat, as Tristan Nitot, the president of Mozilla Europe, explains:

“We should emphasise that these measures have been done on a Sunday, when Firefox usage peaks. The Firefox browser is less used during the week, as enterprises are more conservative when it comes to using a newer browser.”

Firefox Grabs 20% European Market Share. Well, SometimesOther Web metrics companies have produced somewhat less spectacular estimates of Firefox’s market share, with OneStat.com reporting in November last year that the browser had notched up a global market share of 11.5%.

Once again, the UK was found to be lagging behind, with just 4.9% of surfers using the software.

Elsewhere, the Mozilla Foundation has set a March launch date for a version of Firefox that will run on Apple’s shiny new Intel-based machines.

Mozilla Firefox
XiTi

Intel Apple G5 Bootups Fast – UPDATED

As we know, Apple has been claiming that the new Intel-based processor is 2-3 times faster than their current machines, due in no small part to Intel’s Core Duo processor.

An enterprising clan has shot what they claim is a video of a boot-up shootout between an iMac G5 vs an Intel-based version.

Taken at face value, the new machines do look considerably faster, but many are claiming that the video is a fix. Reading the comments, a number of people felt that the slow booting machine was faulty or had been violently shutdown, leading to the machine having to rebuild itself on startup.

One thing is for sure. The Intel-based version boots faster than any Windows machine I’ve seen.

Join the other nearly 50,000 people who’ve watched the film and judge for yourselves …

For all Mac traditionalists, you’ll be pleased to hear that the new machines use the same boot up sound.

Update: The new Intel-based Macs use Intel’s new boot technology – Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI). This has been designed to make machines startup as quickly as possible – a benefit that the Mac is showing, and so too will Windows Vista. Thanks to Seamus for pointing this out.

iMac G5 vs iMac Intel Boot

No To DRM Say UK NCC To MP’s

No To DRM Say UK NCC To MP'sIn its submission this week to an MPs’ inquiry into Digital Rights Management (DRM), the influential National Consumer Council (NCC) spelt out its concern at current self-regulation, and called for new laws to ensure consumers’ rights to use digital content are protected.

DRM technology is increasingly being used in products such as CDs, DVDs and music downloads to control or restrict the use of copyrighted digital works. As the recent Sony/BMG case illustrates, this is proving problematic for consumers. It was recently discovered that the ‘anti-piracy’ software included by Sony/BMG on a CD by country rock group Van Zant, included ‘cloaked’ files that installed a proprietary player to play the CD. The user was then unable to uninstall the player.

No To DRM Say UK NCC To MP'sPeople are finding they can’t play the DVDs they’ve bought abroad or make compilations of material that they have purchased for their own use. The NCC believes that the use of DRM can and is already constraining the legitimate consumer use of digital content. It is also undermining consumers existing rights under consumer protection and data protection laws.

The NCC’s document says, “Intellectual property law needs to find a fair balance between protection and competition – too much or too little IP protection will lead to a loss of economic welfare. In recent years it has become clear to us that this balance is not being achieved.”

No To DRM Say UK NCC To MP'sJill Johnstone, Director of Policy at NCC said; “Because of the current situation, consumers face security risks to their equipment, limitations on their use of products, poor information when purchasing products and unfair contract terms.

“Whilst we recognise the value of intellectual property rights, we have little confidence in self-regulation by the industry. We welcome this opportunity to present our concerns to MPs and hope that this will ultimately lead to an improvement the rights of consumers.”

Read NCC DRM submission to MP’s (PDF)

UK Mobile TV Trials Get Mixed Response

UK Mobile TV Trials Get Mixed ResponseTwo recent studies into mobile TV on 3G mobile phones have managed to produce rather inconclusive results concerning the willingness of the great British public to use the service and how much they’d be prepared to pay for it.

The preliminary findings of a trial by UK mobile phone operator O2 in Oxford revealed that the majority of users were overwhelmingly in favour of the service and would consider taking it up.

Around the clock live access to 16 TV channels was offered to 375 O2 users from a “wide range of demographics” in the 18-44 age band, in a trial carried out in partnership with broadcast technology company Arqiva.

UK Mobile TV Trials Get Mixed ResponseThe feedback seemed back-slappingly reassuring, with 83 per cent of the triallists “satisfied” with the service, and 76 per cent indicating they’d be keen to take up the service within 12 months.

Users were given specially adapted Nokia 7710 smartphones to view the DVB-H service in late September 2005.

Most users averaged around three hours TV a week, with some square eyed viewers clocking up as much as five hours a week.

Predictably, demand was highest in the mornings, lunchtimes and early evenings.

UK Mobile TV Trials Get Mixed Response“This trial is further illustration that we are moving from a verbal only to a verbal and visual world in mobile communications,” said David Williams, O2’s technology chief.

“Broadcast TV for mobile can be a powerful new service that further enables users to personalise their mobile handset so that they can always have the content they want,”>Mixed results for BT and Virgin Mobile

The findings weren’t so rosy from BT and Virgin Mobile’s six month mobile TV trial.

Their 1,000 London-based users reported that they preferred to listen to digital radio rather than watch TV on their mobiles.

Moreover, they didn’t value the service particularly highly either, stating that they were only willing to shell out £5 a month for broadcasts, far short of the £10 monthly charge that operators were hoping to levy.

The BT/Virgin trial found that although people liked mobile TV – 59 per cent found it appealing or very appealing – there was more enthusiasm for digital radio (65 per cent.)

Moreover, triallists used the radio more (95 minutes a week, compared to 66 minutes of TV viewing) – a figure also reflected in the 02 trials, where 7 out of 10 users wanted digital radio channels to be included in a commercial service.

BT also discovered that news clips and favourite shows proved far more popular with viewers than mobile versions of shows.

The companies concerned will be keen to learn the lessons of these trials, as mobile multimedia services are vitally important to telecom operators looking to generate income and recoup their vast investments.

BT Abandons Internet Kiosk Empire

BT Abandons Internet Kiosk EmpireBT has cut short its ambitious plans to transform phone boxes into interactive Internet gateways.

BT had originally planned a large national roll-out of public multimedia kiosks, turning call boxes into mini-offices where punters could make calls, fire off emails, send SMS text messages and surf the web.

The first super-charged phone boxes appeared on the streets four years ago, with BT announcing plans to install a total of 28,000 Internet booths in high traffic areas like train stations, shopping malls and city centres.

Sadly, the cunning plan stalled after just 1,300 of the Marconi-built booths had been installed, with BT now abandoning plans to create any more.

BT Abandons Internet Kiosk EmpireIn a public statement BT said, “There are no immediate plans to reduce the base of public multimedia kiosks other than moving to locations with better revenue earning potential and agreeing moves with our managed site owners.”

Despite this, some industry experts are suggesting that some of the existing booths may also be removed and downgraded back to humble ‘vanilla’ phone boxes in the near future.

BT Abandons Internet Kiosk EmpireWith the continuing exponential growth in Internet-enabled mobile phones and Wi-Fi, we wouldn’t be surprised if we see some of these all-singing phone terminals disappearing sooner rather than later.

BT