Business

Changes to business digitisation brings

  • Judge Harry Edwards Attacks FCC Broadband Wire-Tap

    Judge Harry Edwards attacks the FCC Broadband Wire-TappingEFF-fans and electronic freedom groupies have a new poster boy who comes from an unlikely profession. They’re normally attracted to open-source code-a-holics, or white hat hacker, but this one’s a judge.

    On Friday, Judge Harry Edwards tore a few strips off the associate general counsel, Jacob Lewis, representing the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). He was one of three judges at a hearing of the federal appeals court, investigating whether the US government have the same right to tap VoIP phone conversations as they currently have with ‘normal’ phone lines.

    The quotes that Reuters are reporting are pretty choice. In a response to hearing their arguments, he replied, “This is totally ridiculous. I can’t believe you’re making this argument.”

    He didn’t stop there, later letting them have it with both barrels.

    “Your argument makes no sense,” Edwards told Jacob Lewis, an associate general counsel with the FCC.

    “I’m sorry I’m not making myself clear,” Lewis said.

    “You’re making yourself very clear. That’s the problem,” Edwards replied.

    Wow, that is cutting.

    Judge Harry Edwards attacks the FCC Broadband Wire-TappingThe ride wasn’t so rough from the other two judges, with the second, David Sentelle, appearing to side with the FCC, especially for Internet phone services. The last, Janice Brown kept her thoughts to herself.

    We await the T-shirts flooding the market.

    FCC
    EFF

  • Beatles Lose To Apple Computers

    Beatles Lose To Apple ComputersAs is now part of computer-lore, Apple Computers were called so because of the founders loves of the Beatles and their record label, Apple Corps.

    Then money got involved and the love started to fade.

    Back in 1981 Apple Corps and Apple Computers came to a legal agreement over the use of the Apple trademark, but this was on the condition that Apple Computers didn’t enter the music business.

    It all got a bit heated back in 1989 when both parties must have spent a fortune on a case that dragged out over two years at London’s High Court. The precise details of the settlement weren’t made public, but money was have though to have passed to the record label from the computer company.

    Beatles Lose To Apple ComputersLatterly Apple Corps, with some justification, felt that Apple Computers had now entered the music business, through their iPod players and iTunes music store, so they brought legal action again.

    Today we got judgement. The Judge of the case, Mr Justice Edward Mann, came done on the side of Apple Computers saying that they used the Apple logo in connection with their iTunes stores not the music, so there had been no breach.

    Slightly confused? The Judge said that the Apple logo isn’t ever directly tied to specific music titles or artists. The judge agreed, and noted that the Apple logo was integrated into the store, not the music sold.

    The more sharp-eyed among you will have noticed that iTunes doesn’t have a great deal of Apple branding on it (but it does have the bitten-Apple logo), perhaps for the very reason of the chance of legal action. Following this verdict, it will be interesting to see how or if this changes.

    Beatles Lose To Apple ComputersWhat drove the legal action?
    We’ve been wondering what the driver for this was this action down to macho pride or an attempt at financial gain?

    OK, there has been a history of Apple computers and Apple Corp with their logo, but don’t the Beatles have enough money already – I mean they’re swimming in the stuff aren’t they?

    Please tell me something funny
    What can we tell you that’s a bit fun about this story which is frankly pretty dry? Geoffrey Vos QC who represented Apple Corps, downloaded Chic’s Le Freak (1978 version) when demoing iTunes to the courtroom

    (Please let there not be another legal battle between these two again, I’m really bored in having to type out Apple Corp and Apple Computers)

  • Pixar And Disney Wed

    Pixar and Disney WedA quick catchup. We’ve been covering the Pixar/Disney, will they/won’t they get together for a while now and see that it’s finally come to pass that the Pixar board have voted to join Disney.

    In the all-stock transaction, 2.3 Disney shares will be issued for each Pixar share. The most senior Pixar people will be taking interesting, senior roles at Disney reporting directly to Robert A. Iger, President and Chief Executive Officer Disney. Jobs will be joining the Disney’s Board of Directors as a non-independent member.

    As we’re sure you know, Pixar has been providing Disney with computer-generated (CG) masterpieces for 11 year.

    It all got going when Steve Jobs, after getting kicked out of Apple by John Sculley, the man he brought in to ‘take Apple to the next level’ (who in fact nearly killed it), bought the computer graphics division of Lucasfilms in 1986 for a cool $10m.

    Initially Pixar survived by making adverts such as the boxing Listerine bottle, picking up a hamper of awards in the world of CG.

    Big things started to happen in 1995 when Pixar simultaneously went public in the US, raising $140m, and their first film with Disney, Toy Story, hit the cinema. It became the highest grossing film of 1995 taking $362m worldwide at box office alone. We’re sure you all remember the masses of merchandising, making Disney huge amounts of extra income.

    Pixar and Disney WedIn 1998 A Bug’s Life came along also bringing $362m in worldwide ticket sales, 1999 saw Toy Story 2 ($485m). The following years saw Monsters Inc, Finding Nemo, The Incredibles all do very well, sealing Pixar as _the_ CG animation stuido.

    Pixar and Disney had a very public spat where Pixar said that they wouldn’t supply their films to Disney exclusively. Disney played it all cool, effectively saying ‘see if I care?’ We can plainly see from the purchase that they did actually care quite a lot.

    Pixar
    Disney

  • Vodafone Pre-Empts Viviane’s EC Rip-off Roaming Action

    She’s got a mission to eliminate mobile phone roaming rip-off charges. She’s Commissioner Viviane Redding of the EC, and today, Vodafone took PR action to keep itself out of her sights, by promising to “cut roaming by 40%” by this time next year.

    Vodafone’s announcement says: “Average European roaming costs for Vodafone customers will be cut by at least 40% by April 2007, when compared to last summer.”

    This, it says, “will benefit over 30 million Vodafone customers who roam every year, and will see the average cost of roaming in Europe fall from over €0.90 to less than €0.55 per minute.”

    Ironically, Vodafone is probably not highest on Commissioner Redding’s hit list. It’s certainly possible to pay over the odds for Voda phone calls when overseas – pick the wrong contract! – but amongst the giants, Voda actually scores quite well on fair use, especially if you’re a Passport subscriber.

    Arun Sarin, Chief Executive, Vodafone, said: “Customers want simplicity and value for money when they’re travelling abroad. They get it with Vodafone Passport, which we launched last year, allowing customers to take their home tariff abroad with a small additional per call fee. Today Passport provides savings of at least 30% for more than 6 million Vodafone customers.”

    But like many of the giants, Vodafone is suffering from the cost of providing phones. All the European operators, traditionally, subsidise handsets; they give them away, or sell them for a fraction of their cost, in the expectation of making substantially more out of phone call charges – and it works.

    Unfortunately, we’re changing our phones too often. It’s mostly the shops that do this, because they are incentivised to do it by the networks.

    The networks all pay a premium to a phone shop who “steals” a customer from a rival network. At the same time, paradoxically, they’re trying to make contracts longer: 12 months minimum, 18 months or even longer, as standard.

    So the trend is to pay as you go phones – which tend to be paid for. And it’s PAYG agreements which most heavily penalise you when roaming. That is, assuming that your PAYG phone even makes it possible to use it overseas; many don’t.

    Sarin said: “The success of Passport shows the demand for simple, great value roaming in Europe and today we’re showing that Vodafone will continue to lead the industry in providing it.”

    What he probably means, is that Passport needs to be able to compete with PAYG, and Vodafone sees no harm in ingratiating itself with the Commissioner for Information Society and Media while doing so.

    Viviane Redding
    Guy Kewney’s NewsWireless

  • NTL, BT Nowhere In Premier League Football Bids

    NTL Nowhere In Premier League Football BidsThere had been some excitement, well amongst UK media analysts at least, that BSkyB might loose its dominance of the control of UK football’s Premier League.

    Today we learned who the winners were.

    Following pressure from the European Union (EU), who had stated that all matches couldn’t be controlled by the same broadcaster, the games for this round of bidding were split into six packages of 23 games each. The EU threatened legal action against the Premier League if their will wasn’t complied with. Not surprisingly, they did.

    Clearly BSkyB bid. Having exclusive right to the football was one of the cornerstones that built the success of Sky in the UK.

    Other bidders included NTL, fronted by the bearded-wonder – Richard Branson, who had been acting the big I AM, threatening to out bid Sky for the available six packages. BT made some noises too.

    NTL Nowhere In Premier League Football BidsFinally the other company, Irish broadcaster Setanta, had thrown its hat into the ring, originally saying they were going to bid for two of the packages. Those not in the broadcast world wouldn’t necessarily know who Setanta are, but most people will know of their 40% owners, Benchmark Capital.

    The results of the bidding? Sky got four of them and Setanta the other two. With only six on offer, the other pretenders got nothing.

    For the UK Football Association, it’s a giant payday with the total amount paid rising from £1Bn three years ago, to £1.7Bn covering the next three years. Not bad work if you can get it. Expect many more overpaid footballers and lurid stories in the tabloids. The Cristal champagne will be flowing tonight.

    Premier League

  • $8Bn US Ad Income At Risk From PVRs: JupiterResearch

    $8Bn US Ad Income At Risk From PVRs: JupiterResearchJupiterResearch have released research that indicates that 53 percent of Digital Video Recorder (DVR)/PVR users in America have used their DVRs to skip commercials.

    Amazing isn’t it? What are the other 47% doing? Have they still left the DVR in the box, yet to plug it in? Why would anyone with a DVR not want to skip through the adverts unless they weren’t in the room; had some medical condition where they weren’t able to operate the remote control; didn’t know that they could skip through adverts; worked in the advertising industry and loved it so much they wanted to see all of the advert possible; were asleep while watching TV (this is likely given the quality of what’s shown); or a handful of other implausible reasons?

    Jupiter claim that there’s a potential to threaten $8 billion out of the $74 billion US TV advertising market. This is like being at the birth of TiVo all over again – but this time for the people who weren’t there/listening/believing the first time.

    Quick recap on events last time – the TV companies, advertising agencies and anyone else with a vested interest then poo-poo the idea, saying it will never catch on. You may even remember some later research from Sky TV in the UK laughably saying that their research found that people watched more adverts when using their Sky+. Yes you read that right, more adverts. Clearly it was designed to stop mass panic among their many advertisers.

    $8Bn US Ad Income At Risk From PVRs: JupiterResearchNow where we’re united with Jupiter is that people watch more TV when they’ve got a DVR. That is the experience of the vast majority of PVR/DVR users.

    Their report The DVR Dilemma: Managing Consumer Behavior found that the ad-skippers watched 18 hours of television, over the normal 17 of the DVR-less. Given they’re skipping the adverts, chopping around 15-20 mins of adverts out per hours, that’s a considerable amount of more ‘entertainment.’

    Is it likely that the advertising world will come back and deny it again? Probably not, just you can never tell with those wiley old birds can you? I’d expect some sort of counter spin.

    The DVR Dilemma Managing Consumer Behavior: JupiterResearch

  • Live Football And Cricket on Vodafone 3G Mobiles

    Live Football And Cricket on Vodafone 3G MobilesThis weekend marks the start of Vodafone UK offering live coverage of international cricket and the Football League Playoffs from Sky Sports to their 3G customers.

    They’re keen to point out that this is the first time in the UK, live football matches will be shown simultaneously live on mobile and on TV.

    It’s not like this is going to be a trickle of content. There’s over 100 hours of coverage scheduled in the first month, with fifteen live football matches and three live Test matches. The cricket will continue with live coverage until the final Test against Pakistan in September.

    Don’t think there’s going to an extra financial penalty to pay for this. The coverage will be available at no extra charge as a bonus service for subscribers to Sky Mobile TV’s News, Sports and Factual Pack.

    Having said that the packages aren’t what you’d call cheap. Each Sky Mobile TV pack (detailed below) is and extra £5/month.

    Sky has been actively putting its content over different platforms for quite some months now, following the announcement in January of Sky by Broadband which delivers some of Sky’s content to PC’s over a, you guess it, broadband connection.

    Live Football And Cricket on Vodafone 3G MobilesBizarrely, Sky specify that the content is for Personal use only. Errr … it’s on a mobile phone Sky. It’s not like you’re going to get the throngs in the pub crowding around watching it on a tiny screen. That is until someone comes up with a huge magnifying glass that the phone sits behind.

    The packs that are available are

    • News, Sport & Factual Pack: Sky News; CNN; Bloomberg; Sky Sports News; At The Races; Discovery Mobile Factual; National Geographic Channel; The History Channel.
    • Entertainment Pack: Sky One; Sky Movies; Living TV; Discovery Mobile Lifestyle; Nickelodeon; Paramount Comedy; Cartoon Network; Bravo; The Biography Channel and MTV Trax and MTV Snax.
    • Music Pack: MTV Trax, MTV Snax, The Box, Smash Hits, Kiss, Kerrang, B4, IMF and IMF 2.

    Most of these don’t run live but are made up of dedicated ‘made for mobile’ channels, featuring regularly updated blocks of programming.

  • IFA Berlin CE Show Yearly From Now On

    IFA Berlin CE Show Yearly From Now OnLast year took ourselves to Berlin to attend IFA. Being the first time we’d attended we were _totally_ blow away at the size of the place – it’s massive. Every side of the Consumer Electronics (CE) industry was covered, from the smallest to the largest with the later building their own houses (Siemens, Deutsche Telekom).

    Previously it’s been on every two years and, acknowledging the speed that the CE world is now moving, the German CE trade body, gfu and event organisers, messe-Berlin have now realised a year gap between shows is impractical. IFA 2006 will mark the start of them moving to a yearly show, frankly so they don’t become obsolete – oh and there’s the benefit of all of that extra income, so course.

    Dr Christian Göke told us he was “convinced that there would be an increased difference between work and home in the future,” and that this would be one of the reasons that IFA would continue in its position as the second largest CE show in the world.

    IFA Berlin CE Show Yearly From Now OnAsked why IFA was so loved by trade visitors, his answer was simple, “We treat them as VIP’s. Nothing is too much and they feel very special.” Sounds like a recipe for success to us, one that could easily be learned by many other shows around the world.

    We understand that exhibition space has been selling like hot Strudel, with over 80% gone already. They also spreading their wings to include companies like mobile giant o2.

    One of our major gripes last year was that with us being linguistically-challenged (being English ‘n’ tha’) some of the press conferences were held only in German. Reasonable being it was in Berlin, but not great for attracting an International audience. From now on they’ll all be held in English. Hurrah!

    So if you fancy joining us, get yourself over to Berlin, 1-6 September.

    IFA 2006

  • ‘No Vista Till 2Q 2007’ Says Gartner

    'No Vista Till 2Q 2007' Says GartnerResearch firm Gartner has said that it expects Vista, Microsoft’s major Windows upgrade, to not appear until the second quarter of next year.

    According to Gartner, Windows Vista is unlikely to rear its shiny, Aero-decorated head before the second quarter of 2007 – possibly for an April launch with “broad availability” following in the same quarter.

    This projection puts the release date several months behind Microsoft’s scheduled launch date of January 2007.

    Writing in a research note, Gartner commented, “Microsoft’s track record is clear. It consistently misses target dates for major operating system releases. We don’t expect broad availability of Windows Vista until at least 2Q ’07.”

    'No Vista Till 2Q 2007' Says GartnerMicrosoft’s current plans involve releasing Vista to manufacturing in October/November 2006 and making it available to enterprises through volume licenses by the end of this year, with the OS becoming available to computer manufacturers for shipping in January, 2007.

    Although Windows users are no strangers to endlessly delayed launches, a Microsoft spokesperson insisted that all was well in the wonderful world of Windows.

    'No Vista Till 2Q 2007' Says Gartner“Respectfully disagreeing” with Gartner’s view, the spokesperson said that that finished Windows Vista would ship in November and January with a second beta ready to roll in the second quarter of this year.

    Gartner was having none of it, sagely advising that “one should never overestimate how much Microsoft will underestimate the complexity and time needed to deliver a major new client OS.”

    Windows Vista’s slipped timeframe [Register]

  • Telewest Get ASA Dodgy Advert Slapdown

    Telewest Get ASA Dodgy Advert SlapdownBroadband giants Telewest have had to bend over and feel the sharp swish of the Advertising Standards Agency’s corrective ruler on their ample rumps after their broadband radio advert was deemed ‘misleading.’

    The advert seemed straightforward enough:

    “… getting broadband couldn’t be easier. Telewest even install it for you. Get unlimited broadband and you can also have digital TV and a phone line, all three for £30 a month. If you live in a Telewest area and you want all three for £30 a month for a year call xxxx or go to Telewest.co.uk. Available to customers taking new services. Minimum term contract and conditions apply.”

    Telewest Get ASA Dodgy Advert SlapdownA Telewest customer – clearly already living in a Telewest area – liked the sound of the deal so much they rang up to sign on, only to find that they were clearly in the wrong sort of ‘Telewest area.’

    When the customer was told that the full range of Telewest products was not in fact available, a stroppy mail was despatched to ASA who made short thrift of Telewest’s insistence that their “Conditions apply” caveat covered their ass.

    With Telewest admitting that they were unable to offer digital services to 100% of their customers as 3.7% were situated in non-digital areas, the bendy ruler of the ASA was administered with relish as the complaint was upheld.

    Telewest Get ASA Dodgy Advert SlapdownThe ASA concluded, “We considered this important restriction should have been explained in the ad and that “Conditions apply” had not been adequate to cover such a significant condition to the offer. The ad breached CAP (Broadcast) Radio Advertising Standards Code section 2, rule 3.”

    ASA