<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK File-Sharer Has To Pay £16,000: Historic Background</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/08/19/uk-file-sharer-has-to-pay-16000-historic-background/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/08/19/uk-file-sharer-has-to-pay-16000-historic-background/</link>
	<description>Reporting the effects of Technology on the Media and Communications.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:59:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/08/19/uk-file-sharer-has-to-pay-16000-historic-background/comment-page-1/#comment-73110</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/08/19/uk-file-sharer-has-to-pay-16000-historic-background/#comment-73110</guid>
		<description>It should be know that the number of copyright infringment letters that Davenport have sent out is around 25,000.

I cannot imagine Davenport being successful if a defendant mounts a reasonable defence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be know that the number of copyright infringment letters that Davenport have sent out is around 25,000.</p>
<p>I cannot imagine Davenport being successful if a defendant mounts a reasonable defence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK Game Piracy: Propaganda, Evidence and Damages - Zwartbaard</title>
		<link>http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/08/19/uk-file-sharer-has-to-pay-16000-historic-background/comment-page-1/#comment-69678</link>
		<dc:creator>UK Game Piracy: Propaganda, Evidence and Damages - Zwartbaard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/08/19/uk-file-sharer-has-to-pay-16000-historic-background/#comment-69678</guid>
		<description>[...] official comment that I received from Davenport’s PR company Bell Pottinger,” he told us. And here it is: The initial default judgment was made against her was at the London County Court on 27 May. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] official comment that I received from Davenport’s PR company Bell Pottinger,” he told us. And here it is: The initial default judgment was made against her was at the London County Court on 27 May. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK Game Piracy: Propaganda, Evidence and Damages &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/08/19/uk-file-sharer-has-to-pay-16000-historic-background/comment-page-1/#comment-69676</link>
		<dc:creator>UK Game Piracy: Propaganda, Evidence and Damages &#124; TorrentFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/08/19/uk-file-sharer-has-to-pay-16000-historic-background/#comment-69676</guid>
		<description>[...] comment that I received from Davenport&#8217;s PR company Bell Pottinger,&#8221; he told us. And here it is: The initial default judgment was made against her was at the London County Court on 27 May. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comment that I received from Davenport&#8217;s PR company Bell Pottinger,&#8221; he told us. And here it is: The initial default judgment was made against her was at the London County Court on 27 May. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
