Comments on: ACDSee Pro2 Photo Manager (90%) http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/02/08/acdsee-pro2-photo-manager-90/ Reporting the effects of Technology on the Media and Communications. Sun, 16 May 2010 10:04:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: Bill Minton http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/02/08/acdsee-pro2-photo-manager-90/comment-page-1/#comment-50872 Bill Minton Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:53:46 +0000 http://digital-lifestyles.info/2008/02/08/acdsee-pro2-photo-manager-90/#comment-50872 I've been using ACDSee for a couple of years now. I'm actually still on v7. I've got nearly 13,000 photos cataloged with it though, and it still performs admirably. The speed of ACDSee is great, but the kicker for power users is the total control it gives you. There are options for nearly everything, including writing your tags to the EXIF info which allows some sites (Fotki.com for example) to pull in your tags when you upload photos. Something else many of the competing programs don't offer is the ability to export all of your work in a standard format. ACDSee allows you to export it's database of info in XML which I've used in the past to do other things with. I’ve been using ACDSee for a couple of years now. I’m actually still on v7. I’ve got nearly 13,000 photos cataloged with it though, and it still performs admirably.

The speed of ACDSee is great, but the kicker for power users is the total control it gives you. There are options for nearly everything, including writing your tags to the EXIF info which allows some sites (Fotki.com for example) to pull in your tags when you upload photos. Something else many of the competing programs don’t offer is the ability to export all of your work in a standard format. ACDSee allows you to export it’s database of info in XML which I’ve used in the past to do other things with.

]]>